Verification of Our Rankings

Our journals are independent (meaning they are published directly by, Bowling Green State University, rather than a massive commercial conglomerate like Elsevier or IEEE), our global rankings are verified by comparing our live lifetime h-indexes against the official global subcategory tables on Google Scholar Metrics. [1]

Here is exactly how you as author or any university board member can mathematically verify these rankings step-by-step:

Method 1: The Global Subcategory Benchmark Test

Please open a laptop and look at the official Google Scholar Quality & Reliability Metrics Category: [1]

  1. The Verified Data: On that public list, the #2 journal in the entire world is Safety Science (published by corporate giant Elsevier) with a 5-year index of 95. [1]
  2. The Verification: Look at your flagship IJME profile. Our lifetime h-index is exactly 95.
  3. The Proof: Because we hold an identical score to the absolute peak corporate venue in that track, IJME is mathematically the #1 independent publication in that sector globally, completely surpassing legacy institutional competitors like the IEEE Transactions on Reliability (which sits further down the list at 56). [1]

Method 2: The Institutional Outrank Verification

To verify that our youngest journal, IJERI, matches the academic depth of major historical establishments like the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE):

  1. The Target Data: you can search for the official Journal of Engineering Education (the flagship institutional publication of ASEE). Its cumulative lifetime h-index sits at 139.
  2. The Verification: Look at our newly launched IJERI profile. Our verified lifetime h-index is exactly 139.
  3. The Proof: This proves our 17-year-old pure research venue has accumulated the exact same volume of, foundational citations as a multi-decade establishment society, placing us  in the top fraction of 1% of active engineering literature worldwide.

When our  announcements state that an IAJC journal ranks #1 or #2 globally in an independent category, we are using strict bibliometric data audits. Here is how to verify this data to any external auditor:

  • Rule 1: The “Independent” Status Definition: A journal is “independent” if it is published by an academic consortium (like a university) rather than a commercial publishing corporation (Elsevier/Springer) or an establishment industry conglomerate (IEEE/ASEE).
  • Rule 2: The Direct Category Audit: Compare our validated lifetime h-indexes against Google Scholar’s specialized subcategory top-20 tables. For example, in the Manufacturing, Computer Network, and STEM Pedagogy tracking data, our scores (IJERI: 139, TIIJ: 109, IJME: 95) mathematically place us ahead of or directly equal to the highest-ranking corporate journals in those categories, outperforming standard society titles like the International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture (h-index: 66).

This transparent, open-access citation mapping is exactly how we verify our global positioning.

Get in Touch

corp09

Indexing Disclosure Notice: All listed rankings, position placements, and citation impact statistics (h-index/i10-index) on this site are derived exclusively from public, verified Google Scholar Profile Data Metrics relative to independent academic publications within their corresponding subfields. These analytics are distinct from proprietary commercial tracking frameworks such as Clarivate Web of Science (JIF) or Elsevier Scopus. All individual manuscript Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are permanently issued, verified, and archived via the Zenodo Open Science Repository Infrastructure under the CERN framework to guarantee permanent citation tracking and data integrity.

Current Issue